You appointed a privacy officer and stopped there
The appointment was the easy part. The rest — recorded consent, retention periods, the ability to find one person's data — lives in the tools, and the tools didn't change.
No software is "Law 25 compliant" in itself: compliance belongs to the business, not the tool. What a system can do is make the obligations sustainable day to day — record consent at the moment it's given, let you find and delete a person's information, and document where data is hosted. A vendor selling you compliance itself is selling something they don't own.
The appointment was the easy part. The rest — recorded consent, retention periods, the ability to find one person's data — lives in the tools, and the tools didn't change.
Inbox, spreadsheet, invoicing software, newsletter platform, Facebook messages, the rep's notebook. If you were asked tomorrow to delete everything you hold on one person, how long would it take?
The question isn't theoretical: sending personal information outside Quebec triggers a prior assessment. Many mainstream tools host elsewhere, and that fact isn't on the pricing page.
Every contact carries a record of what they consented to, when, and through which channel. It's also what separates a legitimate follow-up from spam — the same data serves both laws.
Finding everything the system holds on someone must be a search, not an investigation. That capability is what makes access and deletion requests practical.
A policy that says "we keep three years" and a database holding everything since 2014 contradict each other. Rules apply automatically, or they don't apply.
We tell you where data resides and why, before building. Where Canadian hosting is possible and relevant, it's the default — and where it isn't, you know what that entails.
This is not a legal service and we are not lawyers: we don't draft your privacy policy and we don't rule on your compliance. If you need a legal opinion or a formal privacy impact assessment, you need legal counsel — we build the system that makes decisions enforceable once they're made.
No sales page writes this section. That's precisely why it's here: it saves you a thirty-minute call, and saves us an engagement we'd decline anyway.
No. It can make compliance sustainable without dedicating a full-time person to it, which is different — and that's the only honest promise. The obligations remain the company's.
The law doesn't forbid hosting elsewhere: it requires a prior assessment before communicating personal information outside Quebec. Canadian hosting often simplifies the file, but it isn't a checkbox that settles everything.
The law applies to businesses operating in Quebec, with no size threshold. What changes with size is the level of effort reasonably expected — not whether the law applies.
Facts external to H&S are linked to their official source. Programs and laws change: check the source before deciding.
You leave with what we saw, in writing, even if we never work together.